If you watch Carlos Marmol enough, you realize the importance of his fastball. While his slurve gets the attention, the heater is his key. When Marmol struggles, he actually finds it easier to throw the slurve for a strike, not the fastball. When Marmol can throw the fastball for strikes, he speeds up his opponent's bat and makes the slurve that much more effective.
I've been saying that for a while now. But I've only validated some of those assertions. Questions I have raised:
- Does Carlos Marmol throw less fastballs when he's pitching poorly?
- Does fastball accuracy drop more than slurve accuracy when pitching poorly?
- When the fastball is thrown for strikes, does he get more whiffs on the slurves?
Let's look at some trends, keeping in mind cause-and-effect are not being addressed.
Month ERA K BB
Apr/Mar 1.56 23 5
May 1.93 31 7
June 7.36 12 9
July 3.97 13 10
August 0.71 14 4
I've mentioned concerns about his high walk rate, even in his post-ASG resurgence, but I see that concern can be put aside at the moment.
So, there's a pretty clear picture of Marmol's roller coaster ride. How about his pitch mix?
Month FB SL FB:SL
Apr/Mar 147 132 1.11:1
May 141 132 1.07:1
June 93 137 0.68:1
July 101 149 0.68:1
August 115 73 1.58:1
That's pretty much the same roller coaster. So, question #1 is a Yes.
Let's look at pitch accuracy a few ways.
B:CS - called pitches
B:S - all swings are assumed strikes
ISZ - in zone rate
SwRt - swing rate
I'm mostly intrigued by swing rates - hitters can probably tell me a lot of what I need to know.
| month | year | cfx | B:CS | B:S | ISZ% | SwRt |
| Mar/Apr | 2008 | FA | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.456 | 0.463 |
| May | 2008 | FA | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.397 | 0.461 |
| June | 2008 | FA | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.387 | 0.258 |
| July | 2008 | FA | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.455 | 0.406 |
| August | 2008 | FA | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.513 | 0.435 |
| month | year | cfx | B:CS | B:S | ISZ% | SwRt |
| Mar/Apr | 2008 | SL | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.477 | 0.326 |
| May | 2008 | SL | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.417 | 0.242 |
| June | 2008 | SL | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.438 | 0.307 |
| July | 2008 | SL | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.456 | 0.383 |
| August | 2008 | SL | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.452 | 0.384 |
Is it just me, or did he struggle a bit with the slurve in May? In any case, it looks like the fastball swing rate follows "the trend" while the slurve also doesn't.
I'll say Yes to #2, his fastball can't find the zone when his slurve still can, especially so when Carlos is performance poorly.
Last, but not least, does an improved (accurate) fastball help get more misses on the slurve?
FA ISZ% SL Whiff Rate
0.456 0.256
0.397 0.344
0.387 0.333
0.455 0.404
0.513 0.143
Not so much - perhaps. I'll say No to #3.
This is rather casual, unsophisticated analysis. Since there's enough validation of my observations, it merits further research. Can we start to find trends in Swing Rate that correspond to impending changes in more traditional performance metrics?
Same thing for pitch selection - if a pitcher (or his catcher/pitching coach) loses "confidence" in a certain pitch, or gains confidence in another, does it indicate a potential shift in his performance?
If someone could recommend a measure of individual game quality - for relievers - I'd be most grateful.





4 comments:
Wouldn't most shifts in pitch distribution affect performance? The pitcher who has pitches of equal effectiveness is rare so I'd think any time there's a shift in which pitch he is throwing and how frequently he is throwing it, there's likely to be a change in performance. Wouldn't you agree?
I knew Marmol was throwing his sliders a lot more in June and July, but I didn't realize it was that much and I honestly didn't know that his fastball was as good as it is. I think he fell in love with that slider and just kept throwing it there for awhile.
Yes and no. One example is a starting pitcher with five pitches. He'll vary the mix if one of them is not working. See Ted Lilly.
In Lilly's case, a drastic (albeit short term) change can actually help sustain a guy.
On the other hand, and this is pure speculation, Chad Gaudin has enough pitches to be a starter, so, he can warm-up and figure out what two or three pitches will work that particular day.
Also, a pitcher can use a two-seam or a four-seam fastball on a given day, depending on how they happen to be throwing that day (e.g. use less two seamers if you're getting a lot of movement anyway).
The key thing, the basis for all this, is how well a pitcher is throwing a certain pitch is reflected first in the quality, and second in the performance, and third in the usage. The guy who can figure out what to hide skips to step 3 pretty fast.
For a pitcher like Marmol, with just two pitches, knowing he can't hit a barn with one pitch allows you to sit on the other pitch. Maybe. In any case, he can't hide anything.
A very compelling analysis.
It definitely boils down to skill, followed closely by command. That is why guys like Wood and Marmol can be "effectively wild". They have such dynamic pitches that they only need to make you think they can hit the strike zone. The decreased reaction time needed by the hitter expands the strike zone. If you completely take out one of two pitches then a guy like Marmol becomes predictive which negates the effect of his immense skill.
A very compelling analysis.
It definitely boils down to skill, followed closely by command. That is why guys like Wood and Marmol can be "effectively wild". They have such dynamic pitches that they only need to make you think they can hit the strike zone. The decreased reaction time needed by the hitter expands the strike zone. If you completely take out one of two pitches then a guy like Marmol becomes predictive which negates the effect of his immense skill.
Post a Comment