Update Newsday says Heilman called Minaya to plead his case. Didn't work out.
Since Aaron Heilman still wants to start, and the Mets don't, how about swapping could-be #5's with the Cubs? Jason Marquis is a New Yorker, only a year left on his deal. It isn't that the Mets don't need a #5, they actually don't want to "consider" Heilman.
Heilman made 25 starts for the Mets between 2003 and '05. He went 5-13 with a 5.93 ERA. Those statistics include the very beginning of his major-league career, when he struggled before lowering his arm angle. The Mets, fairly or unfairly, have viewed Heilman as primarily a fastball-changeup pitcher, which makes him better suited for relief work.
Emphasis is mine. As I've noted before, Heilman is a three-pitch pitcher. His slider has proven to be very effective. The full post is here, but here are a couple relevant points:
| cfx | # | mph | pfx_x | pfx_z | deg | rpm |
| CH | 442 | 84.3 | -10.3 | 4.1 | 247.5 | 1,332.8 |
| FA | 1134 | 94.3 | -10.5 | 4.9 | 244.4 | 1,559.8 |
| SL | 209 | 84.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 212.2 | 503.3 |
| 1785 | 90.7 | -9.1 | 4.2 | 241.4 | 1,379.9 |
If Heilman were to move into the rotation, he wouldn't maintain that 94mph average on the heat. Think 91-92 instead.
There's a reason for the low # of sliders - he changed his pitch mix and used the slider on righties quite a lot as 2008 moved on.
| # | year | bats | CH | FA | SL |
| 177 | 2007 | L | 0.3503 | 0.6328 | 0.0169 |
| 595 | 2008 | L | 0.3109 | 0.6487 | 0.0403 |
| 209 | 2007 | R | 0.3206 | 0.6794 | 0.0000 |
| 804 | 2008 | R | 0.1592 | 0.6144 | 0.2264 |
How's he a change-up/fastball guy if he threw more sliders to righties in 2008? Was it not an effective pitch? Looking across both 2007 and 2008:
| cfx | # | LHH | RHH | Swing | Whiff | B:CS | ISZ | Paint | Chase | Watch |
| CH | 442 | 247 | 195 | 0.5407 | 0.3808 | 4.8 | 0.3439 | 0.0995 | 0.4138 | 0.2171 |
| FA | 1134 | 498 | 636 | 0.4568 | 0.1583 | 2.1 | 0.4365 | 0.0996 | 0.3114 | 0.3556 |
| SL | 209 | 27 | 182 | 0.3876 | 0.4815 | 2.1 | 0.4067 | 0.1292 | 0.3065 | 0.4941 |
| 1785 | 772 | 1013 | 0.4695 | 0.2530 | 2.4 | 0.4101 | 0.1031 | 0.3390 | 0.3429 |
That's a very effective pitch, at least by these numbers.
Would he be better than Marquis? Or any other candidate, like Sean Marshall, Angel Guzman, Jeff Samardzija, Rich Hill (just kidding)? Here are some projections to consider:
| Pitcher | System | ERA | IP |
| Heilman | Marcel | 4.25 | 72 |
| Heilman | James | 3.82 | 64 |
| Marshall | Marcel | 4.34 | 85 |
| Marshall | James | 4.14 | 82 |
| Marshall | ZiPS | 4.65 | 89 |
| Marquis | Marcel | 4.61 | 162 |
| Marquis | James | 4.60 | 167 |
| Marquis | ZiPS | 4.80 | 163 |
| Samardzija | Marcel | 3.92 | 39 |
| Samardzija | ZiPS | 5.48 | 133 |
| Guzman | Marcel | 4.60 | 45 |
| Guzman | ZiPS | 5.04 | 50 |
If you consider the difference between being projected as a starter vs. a reliever (and some of these guys get a bit of each in this mixed bag), you might easily figure Heilman will be no more effective than Marquis or Marshall. And that Samardzjia should stay in the pen (ZiPS projects him, along with Guzman and Marshall, as a starter).





0 comments:
Post a Comment